The Law Office of Lance Fletcher, PLLC

NYC Criminal Defense Attorney

One World Trade Center, NY, NY

212.619.3900
  • Home
  • Cases we handle
  • Contact Us
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Testimonials
  • Case Results
  • Payment
  • Case Evaluation
  • Site Search
  • Law
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
  • Criminal Defense

    Experience from Both Sides of Court

    Our Practice Areas
  • Our Attorneys

    Thousands of Criminal Cases Handled

    Attorney Bios
  • Case Evaluations

    Offering Confidential Consultations

    Schedule Yours
Criminal Defense Blog 2014 December Police Need Search Warrant to Access Data on Cell Phones
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Police Need Search Warrant to Access Data on Cell Phones

Posted By Law Office of Lance Fletcher || 30-Dec-2014

The Law Office of Lance Fletcher Reviews T2014's Biggest Changes in the Law

Police Need Search Warrant to Access Data on Cell Phones

The United States Supreme Court decided United States v. Wurie and Riley v. California ruling that even if there was probable cause to believe that information relating to the arrest crime was on a cell phone, police would need to obtain a search warrant in order to access it.

The Court noted however that police can rely on "exigent circumstances" in order to access information on a cell phone without first obtaining a search warrant. Exigent circumstances are essentially emergency circumstances such as where evidence is about to be destroyed or a person will be injured. The Court gave examples of a child abductor who may have information about the child's location on his cell phone, or a suspect texting an accomplice who is preparing to detonate a bomb. These examples show possible imminent harm to people. But the Court also noted that possible destruction of evidence can also qualify as exigent circumstances.

In sum, the police need to get a search warrant to access data on phone unless there is an imminent risk of harm to other people or evidence would be destroyed otherwise.

Categories: Criminal Defense, Lance Fletcher Reviews

Share Post

NYC Criminal Defense Attorney

We handle all NYC criminal cases.

  • Accidents, Leaving the Scene
  • Assault
  • Obstruction of breathing and Strangulation
  • Burglary
  • Criminal Defense FAQ
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Criminal Court Appearance Tickets - NYPD Summons
  • Criminal Contempt
  • Criminal Penalties
  • Criminal Mischief
  • Desk Appearance Tickets
  • Desk Appearance Ticket Tips
  • Disorderly Conduct
  • Domestic Violence
  • Driving with Suspended License
  • Driving: Aggravated Unlicensed Operation
  • Drug Possession
  • Drunk Driving / DWI DUI
  • Federal Crimes
  • Firearm Possession
  • Forcible touching (PL 13052)
  • Forfeitures / Civil Demand
  • Forgery
  • Fraud
  • Grand Larceny
  • Grand Larceny Penalties
  • Gun Possession Defense Lawyer
  • Harassment
  • Homicide
  • Identity Theft
  • Immigration Issues
  • Immigration Consequences NY
  • Knifes & Gravity Knifes
  • Menacing (PL 12015 12014 & 12013)
  • Larceny
  • Lewdness & Exposure
  • Law
  • Rape
  • Reckless Driving
  • Resisting Arrest (PL 20530)
  • Robbery
  • Sex Crimes
  • Sex Offender Registration
  • Sexual Abuse (PL 13055, 13060, 13065)
  • Stolen Property (PL 16540 16545 16550 16552)
  • Shoplifting
  • Stalking
  • Subway Offenses
  • Theft of Services
  • Warrants
  • Unlawful surveillance and upskirting

Speak With an Attorney Today

Please enter the captcha above:
Contact Our Firm
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
The Law Office of Lance Fletcher, PLLC

Call Today! (212) 619-3900

The Law Office of Lance Fletcher, PLLC - New York City Criminal Defense Attorney
52 Duane Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10007 View Map
Website: http://www.lawfletcher.com/
© 2023 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.